When
the USA and Israel attacked Iran on 28 February, travel managers’ immediate priority
was to repatriate stranded and endangered travellers in the Middle East. Now
the focus is firmly on economics. With Iran blockaded and – despite recent
signals of possible resolution – the strait of Hormuz closed, one-fifth of the
world’s oil shipments are frozen. Longer term, production facilities on both
sides of the Gulf are damaged.
Consequently,
the price of jet fuel has doubled since hostilities began and concerns are
intensifying that supplies will dry up. The crisis leaves travel managers combating
double-digit air ticket price increases that look set to stay.
“Even
once the conflict is over, we would not expect prices to fall back
immediately,” warns James Austin, director of organisation development for
UK-based TMC Access Bookings.
It
also leaves corporate airline contracts in need of urgent review following abrupt
changes both to airlines’ schedules and customers’ demand.
Buyers may have less volume to meet commitments on certain routes, while in
return suppliers have less capacity to offer.
Buyers
must “reach out to suppliers to engage a discussion on the contract terms,”
says Olivier Benoit, managing director and senior vice president for Advito,
the consultancy wing of BCD Travel. “What's important is not to wait for
the situation to clear up but to assess the impact today that could trigger
renegotiation.”
Here
is how buyers, consultants and travel management companies see price, supply
and demand dynamics playing out, and what they recommend as next steps to
prevent air spend from spiralling out of control.
Price
– likely to rise even higher
Air
fares had already been climbing over the winter, a UK-based global travel
manager tells BTN, speaking on condition of anonymity. Since hostilities
erupted in the Gulf, he has seen fuel surcharges of up to $800 imposed on
long-haul business class, compounded by additional base fare and ancillary fee
(such as bag charge) increases to produce total ticket price rises of up to 15
per cent.
Dutch
multinational lighting corporation Signify was also confronting higher air
costs before the conflict started, partly because of the trend for carriers to
remove their lowest fare classes from the global distribution systems through
which its tickets are booked.
Now
the Iran war has imposed additional hidden costs as well as the obvious ones. On
the meetings front, says Ewa Doromoniec Vieira, global category lead for travel,
expense and events, the outbreak of conflict led to “more no-shows and late
cancellations, which resulted in charges that could not be avoided even though
it wasn’t our fault.”
__________________________________________________________
Discuss fuel costs and skyrocketing air fares live with experts.
REGISTER: BTN News Desk, Monday, 18 May, 4pm BST
__________________________________________________________
Meanwhile,
longer flights caused by airline re-routings have undermined the company’s business
class policy. “We allow business class over six hours,” Doromoniec Vieira says.
“Many colleagues are cost-conscious and if it's a day flight, they may take
premium economy or even economy if it's eight or 10 hours, but flights are
becoming longer and longer, meaning that business class is almost essential.”
Nor
do buyers have any idea how much more pricing pain to brace for on top of what they
have already endured “It can take many months for pricing to stabilise,” says
Access Bookings’ Austin. In this particular case, we anticipate fares
remaining elevated for up to 12 months after the crisis ends, as airlines work
to restore capacity and balance supply with demand.”
Aurélie Duprez, founding
partner of Areka Consulting, expects airlines to keep pushing up fares as their
costs continue to rise. In addition to higher unit prices for fuel, “there
are other factors like new crew safety protocols and, most of all, the detours
that they have to take of up to three hours, because they cannot fly over
certain areas, leading to additional fuel burn. Before the crisis, we were
forecasting 2 to 4 per cent air fare inflation in 2026. Now we are more thinking
more about 5 to 10 per cent,” Duprez says.
Supply – thinner
routes bear the brunt
The new economics of jet fuel
at as much as $200 per barrel has forced worldwide capacity cuts, the
elimination of 20,000 summer schedule flights by Lufthansa being just one
example. To date, said Benoit, airlines have reduced schedules to save fuel
costs, but additional cuts forced by fuel scarcity are a real possibility.
The reductions are “directly
affecting corporate clients when airlines cut secondary or tertiary routes operated
with older, less fuel-efficient aircraft,” Benoit continues. “The impact will
be very specific to each programme. If your travel footprint is served by
multiple secondary and tertiary routes, you may experience a larger impact.”
On
the other side of the balance sheet, says Areka’s Duprez, pulled services to
the Middle East mean airlines “have aircraft they can use on other routes that
are more profitable, the high yield routes from Europe to Asia for instance. We
could see slightly more availability and capacity on those routes.” Benoit disagrees,
citing airport slot constraints.
Demand
– Gulf carriers bleed market share
The purchasing
picture is being shaped not only by where business travellers can fly but where
their companies want them to fly. “Geopolitics changes on an hourly basis these
days,” observes the UK-based travel manager, but at time of writing, his
company is blocking flights to and through the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Israel,
though not Saudi Arabia.
Benoit says “a lot of corporations
have restricted travel to or through the Middle East” but that most Advito
clients are high-spending BTN Top 100 members primarily with direct-flight
policies. In contrast, the big three Gulf carriers – Emirates, Etihad and Qatar
– are used heavily by Areka clients. Since the conflict began, this trio “have
lost 20 per cent share with our clients,” says Duprez. “Other carriers are
getting those shares. The biggest winners are Lufthansa (plus 5 points),
Turkish (plus 3), Air India (plus 2) and Singapore Airlines (plus 2).”
For flights
to Asia and Australasia, Access Bookings also reports a shift to Singapore as
an alternative hub, as well as Hong Kong, Tokyo and Helsinki.
The
complex supply and demand picture makes pricing equally complex. Sitting alongside
actual increases in base fares and surcharges, higher load factors on services
that have gained share, and lower loads on services that have lost share, are
making yield management more volatile as lower fare buckets close faster or
remain open longer accordingly. The UK-based travel manager, for example, has
seen one Gulf carrier raise base fares 7 per cent. Yet business class prices for
London-India are as low as UK£2700 return for travellers prepared to fly via
the Gulf, whereas non-stop ticket prices to India have risen sharply.
What
travel managers can do
Travel
managers’ first step, according to Duprez, should be to ensure their data does
not comprise the base fare alone. Understanding total ticket price and all its
components is essential. That is particularly important because, says the UK
travel manager, “a few years ago we were complaining about the carrier imposed
surcharge being 15 per cent. Now it’s 40 per cent.”
Notoriously,
airlines refuse to include surcharges in their corporate fare negotiations, but
“if the fuel surcharge increase has been 20 per cent and the jet fuel price
evolution is 10 per cent, then definitely a discussion can happen,” says Duprez.
“The airline is probably not going to write a cheque, but you can use that as a
lever to negotiate potentially improved discounts or soft benefits.”
The
travel manager has done exactly that. “One airline made us an offer in February
but I have said ‘you guys need to up our discount by five per cent because the
surcharge is bonkers,” he says.
When
it comes to managing deals on the point of expiring, Duprez urges a case-by-case
approach. “I advise extending with some, renegotiating with some, and ideally deferring
for a few months if that's an option,” she says. “There are certainly carriers
where it does not make much sense to renegotiate right now, typically the
Middle East carriers. However, on others like KLM, Lufthansa, Turkish and a few
APAC carriers such as Air India, Singapore and Cathay Pacific, it does make
sense because they're potentially going to get additional business.
“It's
also very important to protect existing agreements with Qatar, Emirates and
Etihad, because they are likely to be needed at some point,” she added. “The
shift to alternative carriers might be temporary, although it's never good for
the Middle East carriers if this lasts, because when travellers discover that flying
Lufthansa is not too bad or Air India, with its new aircraft, is not what they
imagine, then will they get those travellers back when the crisis is over?”
Meanwhile,
a time of steep fare rises is a time for travel managers to reappraise their
demand management. “There are always three levers to lower air costs,” says the
UK travel manager. “The third is negotiation, but number one is don’t fly,
because you always get a 100 per cent discount. Number two is behave better,” examples
of which, he adds, include booking well in advance, buying non-refundable
tickets where appropriate and flying on off-peak days.
Given
the severe economic challenges airlines face, Doromoniec Vieira believes her potential
to negotiate larger discounts is limited, “which is why I would rather look at
internal processes and reduction of flights, which we were doing anyway. Client
relationships are important, but maybe we can say hello to them virtually once
a month and in person just once a year.”